<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hosting Subversion In the Cloud with Live Mesh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:31:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Subversion and Live Mesh &#171; A Clockwork Durian</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/comment-page-1/#comment-8651</link>
		<dc:creator>Subversion and Live Mesh &#171; A Clockwork Durian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/#comment-8651</guid>
		<description>[...] It turns out someboedy else had the same idea. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It turns out someboedy else had the same idea. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/comment-page-1/#comment-8087</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/#comment-8087</guid>
		<description>Whoa, that&#039;s a really good idea. Then you could have the best of both worlds.  Plus, it makes more sense because then a commit can represent a logical addition of functionality, not just an &quot;I&#039;m going home now, probably should commit these changes, regardless of if they build or not.&quot;

I like that, I&#039;ll have to give it a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, that&#8217;s a really good idea. Then you could have the best of both worlds.  Plus, it makes more sense because then a commit can represent a logical addition of functionality, not just an &#8220;I&#8217;m going home now, probably should commit these changes, regardless of if they build or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like that, I&#8217;ll have to give it a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSizzle</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/comment-page-1/#comment-8076</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/2009/02/hosting-subversion-in-the-cloud-with-live-mesh/#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>Would it be reasonable to include your working copy in the mesh as well?  That way, you don&#039;t have to commit changes if you just want to switch computers.  I know it&#039;s good practice to commit changes as they&#039;re made, but you could hold off if you&#039;re not quite ready but you need to change locations (like desktop to laptop, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be reasonable to include your working copy in the mesh as well?  That way, you don&#8217;t have to commit changes if you just want to switch computers.  I know it&#8217;s good practice to commit changes as they&#8217;re made, but you could hold off if you&#8217;re not quite ready but you need to change locations (like desktop to laptop, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
