<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ScottGu: No plans to drop LINQ to SQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/11/scottgu-no-plans-to-drop-linq-to-sql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/11/scottgu-no-plans-to-drop-linq-to-sql/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:28:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/11/scottgu-no-plans-to-drop-linq-to-sql/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/11/scottgu-no-plans-to-drop-linq-to-sql/#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>It depends on how you define &#039;dropping&#039; LINQ to SQL. They&#039;ll never remove it from the framework, but there won&#039;t be a lot of future investments either. The focus will be on the Entity Framework. That&#039;s pretty clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on how you define &#8216;dropping&#8217; LINQ to SQL. They&#8217;ll never remove it from the framework, but there won&#8217;t be a lot of future investments either. The focus will be on the Entity Framework. That&#8217;s pretty clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
