<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINQ Extension Method Potpourri</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/05/linq-extension-method-potpourri/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/05/linq-extension-method-potpourri/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:28:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dewey</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/05/linq-extension-method-potpourri/comment-page-1/#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/?p=26#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to offend, both methods are completely valid uses.  I should have phrased my comment differently.  this post actually helped me when researching my issue.  I just thought it might be nice to mention the different approaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to offend, both methods are completely valid uses.  I should have phrased my comment differently.  this post actually helped me when researching my issue.  I just thought it might be nice to mention the different approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dewey</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/05/linq-extension-method-potpourri/comment-page-1/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/?p=26#comment-3651</guid>
		<description>Hey,  to conform to LINQ (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb308959.aspx) standards, and to better support concurrency going forward, you should rewrite your ForEach Method to the following

public static IEnumerable ForEach(this IEnumerable list, Action action)
    {
        foreach (T i in list)
        {
            action(i);
            yield return i;
        }
    }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,  to conform to LINQ (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb308959.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb308959.aspx</a>) standards, and to better support concurrency going forward, you should rewrite your ForEach Method to the following</p>
<p>public static IEnumerable ForEach(this IEnumerable list, Action action)<br />
    {<br />
        foreach (T i in list)<br />
        {<br />
            action(i);<br />
            yield return i;<br />
        }<br />
    }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valerio.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FizzBuzz the Functional Way</title>
		<link>http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/05/linq-extension-method-potpourri/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>valerio.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FizzBuzz the Functional Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevalerios.net/matt/?p=26#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] the ForEach extension method is just like the one I talked about before. (Seriously, how could the LINQ designers missed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ForEach extension method is just like the one I talked about before. (Seriously, how could the LINQ designers missed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
